If you own an old house in Claremont long enough, two projects will find you. The windows will start sticking, and the roof will start telling you it is tired.
These are also, not coincidentally, the two projects most likely to run into review. Nobody reviews your bathroom tile. Everybody reviews the front elevation, and windows and roofing are most of what the front elevation IS.
So it is worth understanding why these two elements carry so much weight, and how to approach them in a way that gets you a better house rather than a fight.
Why windows matter so much
A window is not a hole with glass in it. On a period house it is a composition: the size and rhythm of the openings, the proportion of the sash, the number and arrangement of the lights, the depth the frame sits back from the wall plane, the thickness of the muntins, the way the trim resolves at the head and sill.
Change any of those and the face of the house changes, even when a passerby cannot say why. Swap wood sash with divided lights for a vinyl unit with a grid sandwiched between panes and the building loses its depth. The shadow lines go flat. The house reads as a copy of itself.
That is the reason window work draws attention in review. It is the single fastest way to erase the character everyone is trying to protect.
Repair is usually possible, and usually underrated
The sales pitch says old windows are beyond saving. Frequently they are not.
Old sash was often milled from dense, slow growth wood that outlasts anything sold at a lumber yard today. What fails is rarely the wood itself. It is the glazing putty, the paint film, the sash cord, the failed flashing above that let water in, and forty years of paint holding everything shut.
A competent sash restorer can strip, re glaze, re cord, re balance and weather strip an original window and hand you back something that operates better than it has in your lifetime. Add a well fitted storm and the performance argument narrows a great deal. Meanwhile the house keeps its face and you keep the original material, which cannot be bought back.
There are limits, and honesty matters here. Some sash is genuinely gone. Rot at the bottom rail, a frame that has failed structurally, or units that were replaced badly decades ago are all real situations. The right sequence is assess, repair what can be repaired, and replace in kind only what cannot.
Why roofs matter so much
Roofing is the other big one, for two different reasons at once.
Visually, the roof is enormous. Material, colour, texture and profile all read from the street, and the difference between a clay tile field and an asphalt substitute, or between a thick shingle shadow and a flat modern one, is not subtle.
Structurally, the roof is the whole ballgame. Water is what destroys old houses. Not termites, not time. Water. A roof that is failing quietly at a valley or a chimney flashing will rot framing, ruin plaster, feed pests, and eventually reach the foundation area through the walls. Everything else in a preservation plan is downstream of keeping the building dry.
Which produces the practical rule: never let a review conversation stall a genuine leak. Emergency repair to stop water is a different category from a discretionary re roof, and you should tell the City what you are dealing with rather than waiting silently while the house takes damage.
The word to learn is IN KIND
Preservation review generally likes replacement in kind: same material, same profile, same dimensions, same finish. It is the least controversial thing you can propose, and it is often the fastest path through a process.
Where owners run into friction is substitution. A different roofing material that costs less. A window package that changes the light pattern. Trim milled to a stock profile instead of matched to the original. Each of these may be perfectly defensible, but each one is a discussion, and a discussion takes time you did not budget.
Two habits make this easier. Keep a sample of what you are removing, because a physical profile settles an argument that photographs cannot. And document conditions before you touch anything, including close ups of failure, so that the case for replacement is on the record rather than asserted.
Sequence, always
Approvals first, contractors second. That order is not bureaucratic caution, it is financial self defense: a deposit paid on a window package that turns out to need modification is a deposit you argue about. The cluster piece on getting approvals before you get contractors covers this in more detail, and it applies to windows and roofing more than to anything else.
Before any of it, confirm the property's actual status. Whether a Claremont parcel carries a designation, sits within a designated area, or is subject to a recorded agreement is a question only the City of Claremont can answer, and the answer determines whether any of this review even applies to you. The companion piece on how homes qualify for landmark status explains why the difference between charming and designated matters so much.
Two hazards to hand to a professional
Old windows and old roofs both intersect with materials that carry legal handling and disclosure obligations. LEAD PAINT on window sash and trim, and ASBESTOS in some older roofing and related products, are governed by federal and state rules.
This is not a place to improvise or to read your way to confidence. Testing and abatement belong to licensed professionals, and disclosure obligations belong to the transaction. Ask before you sand anything.
The honest bottom line
Windows and roofs are where the money goes on an old house, and they are where the character lives. Those two facts pull in opposite directions, and the resolution is not to pick a side but to plan earlier than feels necessary.
Assess. Confirm status with the City. Get quotes from people who repair as well as replace. Propose in kind first. Keep the house dry above everything else.
Do that and the house outlives you in good order, which is roughly the point.
The rest of the cluster is at the historic homes hub, and the related question of which elements to protect is covered in what to preserve in a Claremont classic. Anthony Grynchal has been licensed in California since November 2009.
Frequently asked questions
Can original wood windows really be repaired?
Often yes. What usually fails is glazing putty, paint, cords, and flashing above rather than the wood itself. A sash restorer can rebuild and weather strip original units, and a well fitted storm narrows the performance gap considerably.
Do I need approval to replace my roof?
It depends entirely on whether the property carries a designation or falls under a recorded agreement, and on current City requirements. Confirm the parcel status with the City of Claremont before scheduling work.
What does replacement in kind mean?
Replacing a failed element with the same material, profile, and dimensions as the original. It is generally the least controversial proposal in a review process because it preserves how the building reads.
What if I have an active roof leak?
Stopping water damage is urgent and is a different situation from a discretionary re roof. Contact the City promptly to explain the emergency rather than letting the building take damage while you wait.

Written by
Anthony Grynchal
Anthony Grynchal is a California real estate professional with eXp Realty, licensed since November 2009 (California DRE# 01873626), and the Designated Local Expert™ for Claremont — where he has lived for more than 33 years.
More about AnthonyPublished · Updated




